Welcome to the TTA Community. TTA Connect is where you can manage and update your profile, search, and view opportunities, manage your work, track payments, and more.
Most “outdated” training doesn’t need to be scrapped, it needs to refresh outdated eLearning content at the surface level: visuals, interactions, branding, and structure, while keeping the instructional design underneath intact. A full rebuild is usually the more expensive, slower option when the actual content still holds up. Here’s how to tell which one you’re dealing with, and how to modernize a course without starting from a blank page.
Somewhere in your LMS is a course that still teaches the right thing, in roughly the right order, but looks like it was built for a different decade. The narration is solid and the knowledge checks work, but the branding is outdated, the interactions feel clunky, and nobody wants to sit through it. Luckily, that’s not a content problem, it’s a packaging problem, and it doesn’t call for a rebuild.
If the learning objectives are still accurate, the sequencing still makes sense, and the assessments still measure the right things, the bones of the course are fine. That’s the expensive part to get right, and it’s usually still there.
Old branding, dated stock photography, clunky click-and-reveal interactions, and templates that look nothing like your current LMS theme are cosmetic problems. They hurt completion rates and perception, but they don’t require touching the underlying design.
Sometimes the issue is format: a course built as static slides when your workforce now expects mobile-friendly, interactive modules. That’s a delivery and interaction upgrade, not a redesign of what’s being taught.
Custom eLearning development can run anywhere from $14,300 to $71,500 per finished hour in 2026, according to TrainingCost.com’s pricing guide, and that’s before accounting for the time a full rebuild takes out of your team’s schedule. Per ATD’s 2026 State of the Industry report, internal costs already consume 66% of the average learning budget, up from 53% the year before. Full rebuilds compete directly with that shrinking margin for new priorities.
There’s also a timing problem: LinkedIn’s 2025 Workplace Learning Report found that 70% of the skills used in jobs in 2015 are expected to change by 2030. Content ages fast enough on its own — spending months rebuilding a course from zero means you’re often optimizing for a version of the job that’s already shifting again by the time it launches.
Swap in current brand colors, typography, and imagery, and move the course into a modern template. This alone resolves most of the “this looks old” reaction learners have before they’ve engaged with a single screen.
Replace outdated click-to-reveal and linear slide interactions with scenario-based branching, drag-and-drop, or short-form video, while keeping the narration script and module structure that already tested well. The freelance instructional design model that’s reshaping the field is well suited to exactly this kind of focused execution work — you don’t need a full team, just the right hands for the interaction rebuild.
Don’t touch objectives, sequencing, or assessment strategy unless something is actually broken. Refreshing what’s outdated while protecting what works is the core of modern instructional design approaches built for today’s learners.
Liberty Mutual Insurance partnered with TTA to expand instructional design capacity for a major new hire training redesign in its Workers’ Compensation division. With an internal team of four instructional designers and more than 60 learning assets requiring updates or rebuilds, the team needed experienced support to meet aggressive timelines without losing development continuity.
TTA provided dedicated instructional designers who integrated directly with Liberty Mutual’s team, developing self-paced modules, job aids, videos, and activities from approved storyboards using Rise 360, Storyline, Vyond, and WellSaid, all built to Liberty Mutual’s existing design standards. The engagement flexed as priorities shifted across phases of the redesign, giving the internal team the throughput to modernize a large asset library without abandoning what was already working.
A refresh updates the visuals, interactions, and delivery format while keeping the existing instructional design intact. A rebuild starts over with new objectives, structure, and content, usually only necessary when the underlying information itself is wrong or obsolete.
If the learning objectives no longer match the job, the content is factually outdated, or the sequencing doesn’t reflect how the role actually works today, a refresh won’t fix it. Those are structural problems that need a rebuild.
Common tools include Rise 360 and Storyline for module development, Vyond for animated video, and WellSaid for AI narration, allowing teams to modernize visuals and interactions quickly without re-authoring content from scratch.
A refresh can often be completed in a fraction of the time of a full rebuild, since the objectives, script, and assessments don’t need to be redeveloped — most of the effort goes into new visuals and interaction design.
If your course library has good bones but an outdated look and feel, see how TTA’s instructional design services can help you refresh it without starting over.
