Welcome to the TTA Community. TTA Connect is where you can manage and update your profile, search, and view opportunities, manage your work, track payments, and more.
Synchronous learning is a training approach where instructors and learners engage in real time, in person, online, or hybrid. Research shows that synchronous learning can reduce cognitive load for complex material and support deeper engagement through live interaction. This article explores what synchronous learning is, its benefits, and how L&D teams can apply it effectively.
The promises of eLearning are legion, and with good reason. An underlying idea of eLearning was that asynchronous learning could eliminate much of the time and expense associated with real-time, instructor-led, onsite learning.
While asynchronous and synchronous learning can produce similar learning outcomes, research shows that synchronous learning lowers the “cognitive load” among learners dealing with more complicated material. Additional benefits of synchronous learning include learner engagement, interactivity, and building new networks among students and instructors.
eLearning encompasses both asynchronous and synchronous delivery methods. While asynchronous learning is an “anytime, anywhere” delivery method, synchronous learning is real-time learning. You can deliver it in a classroom, online, or through a blended approach that combines both, allowing learners to participate either in person or electronically, often referred to as hybrid learning.
Asynchronous learning’s ease of access and consistent delivery are particularly useful for process/procedure and compliance training because each learner receives the exact same information. However, synchronous delivery brings clear benefits that apply across many learning situations, not just synchronous formats.
In a previous post, we detailed the benefits and drawbacks of eLearning in general. Here, let’s look at synchronous learning’s promise.
Through real-time interaction, in the classroom or virtually—or both, learners can:
Instructors can comment and critique assignments, quizzes, poll results, or respond to questions in real-time, allowing learners to make quick adjustments to their understanding. With asynchronous content delivery, learners can replay the point they’d like to clarify, but it’s simply a repetition. Just-in-time responses from instructors or other learners in a synchronous session are especially valuable for complex or fast-changing subjects like technology, healthcare, data science, and information security. Instructors and instructional designers can retrieve measures of participation in text chat, browser focus reports, and other data on learner participation.
Cognitive load refers to the total mental effort a learner uses to process and retain information, especially when the material is new or complex. Because the brain has limited capacity, reducing cognitive load helps learners absorb new material more effectively and perform new tasks with greater ease.
A study published found that the cognitive load experienced by students was lower in the synchronous setting compared to the asynchronous setting.
Synchronous classes also offer schedule consistency. Scheduled times to attend lectures or join discussions can provide structure and predictability that keep learners on track and reduce the temptation to procrastinate.
Live discussions and group projects create new connections among students and instructors. With peer-to-peer learning, learners not only absorb new material but also build a sense of community and have new professional networks once the course is complete.
Before investing in the time and expense of developing a standalone, asynchronous course and then going through multiple iterations to polish it, you can pilot new ideas with a synchronous offering. Instructors gather valuable real-time feedback on how to present new material, engage learners, and help them master new content. Instructors and learners can make revision suggestions based on their experience in the pilot.
Given the benefits of both asynchronous and synchronous learning, it is important to evaluate the criteria that influence delivery decisions.
Choosing the right learning modality requires careful analysis and discussion, particularly among learners, instructors, and instructional designers, and should align with an organization’s broader learning strategy. Understanding delivery approach benefits and drawbacks helps decision-makers make informed choices and achieve learning objectives and performance outcomes. For organizations exploring synchronous, asynchronous, or blended approaches, working with experienced learning experts can support thoughtful design and effective execution.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment *
Name
Email
Website
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Δ